Journalism: The Videogame: Redux

| brandon

Chapters: | Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Next |

Chapter 6: A rattling of sabres

By Christopher Woodard

I used to write about videogames with some frequency. Mostly on message boards, but occasionally for websites as well. One day I just kind of stopped. At the time I thought it was because I had lost enthusiasm for games in general, in addition to wanting to devote my creative energies to something other than arguments about the minutia of role playing games.

I never really stopped playing the games, I simply stopped talking about them. Even in real world conversations with other parties who were clearly excited about games, I would find myself reticent to match an enthusiasm I knew that—at one point at least—I could surpass. Instead I would gently change the topic to something I would feel less embarrassed to seem knowledgable about (the only topics that fit this description would be film and television, which means I was embarrassed by roughly a third of my knowledge base (assuming you count film and television as separate, otherwise amend that to half my knowledge base (parentheses: expect more of these!))).

After publicly ducking the topic enough times I had to ask myself, with a degree of seriousness that should probably never be invested into what one describes as a hobby, why I felt so ashamed about something that has provided more hours of uncomplicated joy than any other single—and I use this term with great affection—distraction in my life. That is a category that includes drunken debauchery, by the way (as that tended be quite a complicated, and thankfully long-past, joy).

The unsurprising answer is that what embarrassed me about conversations about videogames was not the videogames part, it was the conversation part. To be more specific; I don’t like how we talk about games. And I’m not talking about the videogames as art conversation—that conversation simply bores me—I’m talking about something more amorphous and therefore frustrating, because it’s no one thing, but an aggregate of dubiousnesses that defines the conversation about videogames in the online arena (of which most of my experiences with real world videogame conversations are merely an extension). This also means I will be discussing matters in vague terms with few-to-no concrete examples, so apologies in advance for those who find such conversations as frustrating as what I’m whining about.

Here is where I would begin a list of the various things that I consider frustrating about videogame writing, but considering one of my sources of frustration is how every other game-oriented article these days is a top-25-videogame-something-something-list, that would be a level of hypocrisy I have not yet earned the right to even attempt. I mean, I understand why those articles are so prevalent, and I don’t think a list article is inherently bad, but the predomination of these articles feeds into a mentality of how games are discussed that is intensely off-putting: It’s all a fucking competition suddenly. There is little discussion of any individual game as its own unique thing, it’s only in how it stacks in comparison to what it most resembles, or what the creators previously made, or its cinematic/comic influences, or anything but how it compares to its own ambitions. And I don’t mean to imply that context be ignored in discussing, well, anything. Rather, it feels like all that is discussed these days is the context, without allowing room for the possibility of something standing on its own legs or merit.

In fact, on a larger level it feels like geekdom has become not much more than amateur policy analysts using whatever (game, movie, fucking trailer) is currently being discussed as further evidence in support of their thesis as to what the future will bring for their associated favorite hobby vs. what it should be (and like most amateur and even professional analysts of anything, even (the rare) accurate predictions end up being for reasons significantly different than those predicted).

While I’ll fully admit to having done my fair share of this, at a certain point it strikes me as an insane thing to do: Ostensibly we play games because they offer enjoyment. This weird meta-game of industry deconstruction and gossip that has become inexorably attached to every game and its associated discussion, seems to be purposefully diluting the enjoyment of the game itself in order to bolster a sense of identity on the part of arguing parties, by way of having an in-depth opinion. That’s fine when you’re an adolescent trying to define yourself by articulating and defining the world and the things you like and hate about it into coherent sentences, but after a certain point you are destroying what you love in order to sound more certain than you need to.

And it’s perhaps that needless certainty that leads to a much more concrete concern about the conversation about videogames: the tone. More specifically, the snark. I feel like I should preface this by saying I consider myself a cynic. I think cynicism is important and vital in its role of keeping romantics and idealists in check when they receive any degree of power. But cynicism as a general attitude and posture brought to every single discussion and topic regardless of the relative inconsequentialness? As an affectation? As a style guideline? That’s just unattractive. That’s mistaking dour for cool. And it ultimately shows a degree of self-loathing that really isn’t our problem, so stop punishing us for your inadequacies and have just a little bit of goddamn pride in your work. I mean, I’m sure everyone has dealt with a cashier or “sales associate” who rolls their eyes and works extra slow because they’re just so much better than the work they do. Do you ever walk away going “shit, that person was so cool! The way they were unpleasant, and unhelpful and just intensely miserable!” I’m going to just speak for myself and say no, no I don’t think that. And that is the eventual paradox of endless snark in game writing: It becomes writing that thinks it’s above itself, which is possibly the most wearying tone of all.

So if all that is why I didn’t want to talk about videogames publicly, let alone write about them, what’s the position needed for me to speak enthusiastically about them again? Well, it kind of already happened. I began talking to friends who had left gaming for a while but came back this console generation, so they knew nothing of what we call “game journalism” and all the sites and forums and sub-cultures that is implied by the label, and you know what we talk about? We talk about how fun videogames are. There is so much talk about what videogames can, or should, or will be or what they have failed to become that there doesn’t seem to be much attention paid to what they are. That’s what was missing for me. That’s what I want more of. Because frankly, I’ve got other shit to worry about than whether Square-Enix releases another Final Fantasy that isn’t some kind of boondoggle.

Christopher Woodard is some kind of boondoggle.

P.S
I feel the need to say that I think manifestos exist for two eventual outcomes: to be a promise broken, or to be looked back upon in a decade’s time to say, “Hey, remember when we had ambition?”

Let’s see where this one ends up.

Comments

22 Responses to Journalism: The Videogame: Redux

  1. Pingback: The Great Geek Manual » Geek Media Round-Up: July 7, 2011

  2. Pingback: Geek Media Round-Up: July 8, 2011 – Grasping for the Wind

  3. Pingback: Geek Media Round-Up: July 8, 2011 – Grasping for the Wind

  4. GREAT REVIEW! I pretty much agree with all you said in your post, especially at the middle of your article. Thank you, your post is very useful as always. Plase check my free ipad 2 blog, hope you will find interesting information about free ipad 2 there! Keep up the good work! You’ve got +1 more reader of your web blog:) Isabella S.

  5. This course is designed to think of all those who create digital products on the network. No more paying a professional, to create graphics for your site … Acquire technical enough to create quality graphics and start to receive money.

  6. Great beat ! I wish to apprentice while you amend your website, how could i subscribe for a blog website? The account aided me a acceptable deal. I had been tiny bit acquainted of this your broadcast offered bright clear concept

  7. My wife and i have been absolutely more than happy when Albert managed to carry out his inquiry out of the precious recommendations he obtained from your own web pages. It is now and again perplexing to simply find yourself giving for free key points that other folks may have been making money from. And we also do understand we have got you to thank for this. Those illustrations you have made, the straightforward blog menu, the relationships your site give support to engender – it’s mostly astounding, and it’s aiding our son in addition to our family reckon that this topic is brilliant, which is quite fundamental. Thank you for the whole thing!

  8. Hello There. I found your blog using msn. This is an extremely well written article. I will make sure to bookmark it and come back to read more of your useful information. Thanks for the post. I will certainly return.

  9. If you’re still on the fence: grab your favorite earphones, head down to a Best Buy and ask to plug them into a Zune then an iPod and see which one sounds better to you, and which interface makes you smile more. Then you’ll know which is right for you.

  10. I was suggested this blog by my cousin. I’m not sure whether this post is written by him as nobody else know such detailed about my problem. You’re amazing! Thanks!

  11. Journalism: The Videogame: Redux | insert credit Magnificent goods from you, man. I’ve understand your stuff previous to and you’re just too wonderful. I actually like what you have acquired here, certainly like what you’re saying and the way in which you say it. You make it enjoyable and you still care for to keep it wise. I can’t wait to read much more Journalism: The Videogame: Redux | insert credit again from you. Thanks For Share .

  12. Hello Web Admin, I noticed that your On-Page SEO is not that great, for one you do not use all three H tags in your post, also I notice that you are not using bold or italics properly in your SEO optimization. On-Page SEO means more now than ever since the new Google update: Panda. No longer are backlinks and simply pinging or sending out a RSS feed the key to getting Google PageRank or Alexa Rankings, You now NEED On-Page SEO. So what is good On-Page SEO?First your keyword must appear in the title.Then it must appear in the URL.You have to optimize your keyword and make sure that it has a nice keyword density of 3-5% in your article with relevant LSI (Latent Semantic Indexing). Then you should spread all H1,H2,H3 tags in your article.Your Keyword should appear in your first paragraph and in the last sentence of the page. You should have relevant usage of Bold and italics of your keyword.There should be one internal link to a page on your blog and you should have one image with an alt tag that has your keyword….wait there’s even more Now what if i told you there was a simple WordPress plugin that does all the On-Page SEO, and automatically for you? That’s right AUTOMATICALLY, just watch this 4minute video for more information at. WordPress Seo Plugin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

18 − 9 =

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>